Barry A. Warsaw added the comment:
On Jan 20, 2014, at 05:10 PM, Gerrit Holl wrote:
>This is potentially confusing. The documentation in this section has not
>made any mention of %-based substitutions. Rather, a novel reader may, at
>this point, think that {}-based substitution is normal. I would suggest to
>resolve this issue by simply not mentioning %-based substitutions, replacing
>the sentence above by:
>
>> Templates support $-based substitutions, using the following rules:
+1
PEP 292 templates predate .format().
----------
nosy: +barry
title: Potentially confusing formulation in 6.1.4. Template strings ->
Potentially confusing formulation in 6.1.4. Template strings
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20314>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
