Nick Coghlan added the comment: That wasn't quite what I meant. "def (a, b, c)" *looks* like Python syntax (aside from the missing function name), but "def (a, b, c, /)" does not. So I consider "def " a misleading prefix.
By contrast, neither of these looks like it is trying to be a valid function header, while still hinting strongly that it is signature related: "sig: (a, b, c)" "sig: (a, b, c, /)" I would also be fine with "sig=" (since humans shouldn't be reading this regardless): "sig=(a, b, c)" "sig=(a, b, c, /)" ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20326> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
