Paul Sokolovsky added the comment:
Yes, and my note about "scientificity" above. Also compare with your own
account of time.perf_counter() above ("Usually time.perf_counter() is the
expected function.")
Also, I didn't want to start discussion on how to do benchmarking right, just
to point out a small inconsistency, and suggest a fix which balances on
(down-to-earth) correctness and practicality. It even can be ignored, except
that such small inconsistencies accumulate and then some time later stick from
every hole if not addressed.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20475>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
