Paul Boddie added the comment: (Andrew, thanks for making a bug, and apologies for not reporting this in a timely fashion.)
Although an in-memory caching solution might seem to be sufficient, if one considers things like CGI programs, it's clear that such programs aren't going to benefit from such a solution. It would be interesting to know what widely deployed software does use the affected parsers, though. A Google code search might be helpful. I think that the nicest compatible solution would be to have some kind of filesystem cache for the downloaded resources, but I don't recall any standard library caching solution of this nature. Things like being able to write to a known directory, perhaps using the temporary file APIs which should work even as a "very unprivileged" user, would be useful properties of such a solution. ---------- nosy: +pboddie __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2124> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
