Vajrasky Kok added the comment: "But there are some errors that really need two filenames, like copy(), symlink(), and rename()."
I think *need* is too strong word in this case. I agree that two filenames is better than none. But I don't see anything wrong from omitting filenames in error messages for copy(), etc. If PHP and Perl are taking "omitting filenames" way, surely there is some merit in that way. I am in if we are taking "two filenames" way just like Ruby does. It's just isn't it too rush for Python 3.4? ---------- nosy: +vajrasky _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20517> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
