STINNER Victor added the comment: > So this looks like a bug.
Or a different design choice? It looks like the kernel restarts the wait if it was interrupted. "ignore interruptions other than cancelation" http://ftp.cc.uoc.gr/mirrors/OpenBSD/src/lib/librthread/rthread_sem.c "test that sem_timedwait() resumes after handling a signal" http://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/OpenBSD/src/regress/lib/libpthread/semaphore/sem_timedwait/sem_timedwait.c POSIX says that "The sem_timedwait() function shall fail if: [EINTR] A signal interrupted this function." http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009604599/functions/sem_timedwait.html Right now, the best we can do is to skip the test on OpenBSD (maybe only on OpenBSD <= 5.4 to see if it changes later). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20564> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
