Nick Coghlan added the comment: I think there's still value in giving someone experience with the current patch development process, as well as looking for potentially genuine readability improvements.
However, I also agree that automated compliance with a style guide checker can't sensibly be retrofitted to an existing project, even if that project is the originator of the style guide (it generates too much noise in the code history, and risks creating spurious merge conflicts for other changes. In the specific case of the standard library, we also sometimes make exceptions to the style guide to reduce code churn when merging in an existing project, as happened in the case of ipaddress). In this case, I like the alignment fixes in the custom assertion methods, so I'll probably apply those as a small readability improvement. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20815> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com