Guido van Rossum added the comment: I actually prefer some code duplication in this case. Makes the review easier. On Mar 17, 2014 2:17 PM, "Giampaolo Rodola'" <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> > Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment: > > Sorry for not being able to rewrite the patch in time for 3.4. > I will provide an updated patch (I need to setup an Open Solaris box first > though). > The code for poll(), epoll() and /dev/poll will have many similarities, so > I think it makes sense to refactor it and use a base class to avoid code > duplication, similarly to what I did in my original patch. > > ---------- > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue18931> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue18931> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com