Donald Stufft added the comment: > Again: the point is maintenance later, not breakage now.
Ok, well I don't agree that it's more maintenance later to be explicit and not include HIGH, but whatever it's not insecure at the moment so. Attached is a patch against 3.5 for folks to review. ---------- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file34539/better-ciphers.diff _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20995> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
