Nick Coghlan added the comment: On 1 Apr 2014 08:17, "Yury Selivanov" <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > > I'm +0 on new types to clean that up if necessary, but would prefer it if > we could just improve the translation to ordinary signature objects instead. > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "translation to ordinary signature objects". Could you please elaborate on this?
If arguments bound by position disappear from the signature, and those bound by keyword are mapped to keyword-only parameters with a default, we should get a valid and accurate signature. That's a 3.4.1 bug fix, rather than a 3.5 feature. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21117> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
