Jurjen N.E. Bos added the comment:

Well, I partially agree. I see the following points:
Against my proposal:
- For *very* big containers, it can be slower in the case the object is early 
in the container, as you pointed out.
- Current behaviour is easier to understand.

OTOH, fore the proposal:
- Such giant containers are not efficient anyway; that's were set/Counter can 
help.
- The documentation doesn't promise anywhere the objects are scanned in order.

Anyway, if this is supposed to be the behaviour, I suggest to document it, and 
add the following recipe for people dealing with the same problem as I had:

from operator import ne
from itertools import repeat
class MyContainer:
  """container allowing equality search with containsEqual,
  while allowing fast identity search with __contains__:
  use "obj in c" to test if obj exactly sits in c
  use "c.containsEqual(obj)" to test if an object in c has c==obj
  """
  def containsEqual(self, object):
    return not all(map(ne, zip(repeat(object), self)))

  def __ne__(self, object):
    "Your not-equal test"

If you see a more elegant equivalent recipe, feel free to add.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21234>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to