STINNER Victor added the comment: Patch version 6:
- I renamed "int zero" parameter to "int use_calloc" and move the new parameter at the first position to avoid confusion with nelem. For example, _PyObject_Alloc(ctx, 1, nbytes, 0) becomes _PyObject_Alloc(0, ctx, 1, nbytes). It also more logical to put it in the first position. In bytesobject.c, I leaved it at the parameter at the end since its meaning is different (fill bytes with zero or not) IMO. - I removed my hack (premature optimization) "assert(nelem == 1); ... malloc(elsize);" and replaced it with a less surprising "... malloc(nelem * elsize);" Stefan & Charles-François: I hope that the patch looks better to you. ---------- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35097/calloc-6.patch _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21233> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
