Jim Jewett added the comment:
Did you try 3.5 without the patch, in case the issue is not with his code?
On May 13, 2014 7:23 AM, "Serhiy Storchaka" <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
>
> Claudiu, your benchmark is broken, it measure a no-op.
>
> Correct benchmark:
>
> $ ./python -S -m timeit -n 100000 -s "import dbm.dumb as dbm;
> d=dbm.open('x.dat', 'c')" "len(d)"
>
> 3.4: 100000 loops, best of 3: 2.56 usec per loop
> 3.5: 100000 loops, best of 3: 4.17 usec per loop
>
> There is 60% regression.
>
> ----------
> status: closed -> open
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19385>
> _______________________________________
>
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue19385>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
