Trip Volpe added the comment: I found this issue just the other day while researching why we were getting false gaps in our test coverage reports (using Ned's coverage module, natch!). I agree that this seems like a fairly minor nuisance, but it's a nuisance that anybody who has tests and measures test coverage will run into sooner or later -- and that's *everybody*, right?
I think some kind of fix ought to be discussed. After all, "it should be possible to have accurate coverage results" is a proposition that seems fairly reasonable to me. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2506> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
