Eric Snow added the comment: It may be the correct behavior but that doesn't mean we cannot update the repr to be more informative. We've already done that for a number of types that previously used the default __repr__() implementation. So in the case, how hard would it be to have the following repr?
>>> zip([1, 2, 3], ["a", "b", "c"]) zip([1, 2, 3], ["a", "b", "c"]) ---------- nosy: +eric.snow _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue21607> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
