Guido van Rossum added the comment:
I also found some amusing false positives (syntax errors that weren't valid
print statements in Python 2):
print [/
print /
print ) # but not "print)" !
print]
None of these matter though. Perhaps more concerning is how many things are
valid syntax, despite making little sense:
print [42]
print
Still I like the idea -- even if it only catches 50% of all print statements
that would still be a huge win. (And I think it's probably closer to 80%.)
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21669>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
