Tim Peters added the comment: I'm more puzzled by why `__hash__()` here bothers to call `hex()` at all. It's faster to hash the underlying int as-is, and collisions in this specific context would still be rare.
@Josh, note that there's nothing bad about getting sequential hash codes in CPython's implementation of dicts. This is explained in dictobject.c, in the long comment block starting with "Major subtleties ahead:". In any case, I'm closing this, as nobody has brought up a real problem. ---------- nosy: +tim.peters resolution: -> not a bug stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue20446> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com