Alexander Belopolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:
I think the attached patch captures the most of what can currently be
said about <...> reprs.
I think the biggest offender in terms of inconsistency in the 2.x series
is the file object with the repr which does not even start with the name
of the type.
For 3.0, I think it is feasible to standardize on the <{type} object
['{name}'] ... at 0x{addr}> pattern.
----------
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9691/doc-repr.diff
____________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue868845>
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
