Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Closing as a duplicate of issue 1820.
I had been working on this, but there are limits to it. The constructors are completely different so not all of the API can be synced. The __repr__ method is already synced-up. All that is still needed is _asdict(), _fields, and _replace(). The important parts like the __repr__, matching most of the tuple API, and attribute access are already done. ---------- nosy: +rhettinger resolution: -> duplicate status: open -> closed title: Unify structseq and namedtuple's API -> Make structseq's API look more like a nametuple. __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2323> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
