R. David Murray added the comment: There is already a spelling for that operation, and it is d.date(). I'm not sure that there is a strong enough argument for adding a second way to spell it, but I won't close this yet to see what other people think.
Personally I don't think it has ever occurred to me to do date(datetime) (although I have wanted to pass a string to the constructor), and I've wanted the operation and found the 'date()' method more than once. ---------- nosy: +belopolsky, r.david.murray _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22058> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
