New submission from Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Due to blocked merges etc. I expect that some names appearing in the 2.6 ACKS file aren't in the 3.0 ACKS file. And possible the other way around where backports are involved. I like this file to be as inclusive as possible (hey, my dad is in it :-) so perhaps the best approach is to just make them both the union of what they currently are.
---------- keywords: easy messages: 63921 nosy: gvanrossum severity: normal status: open title: Merge 2.6 ACKS with 3.0 ACKS __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2390> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
