Josh Rosenberg added the comment: Reading the note on the Counter class (about intent vs. actual use), it looks like changing this behavior would involve potentially breaking a lot of code.
If you're using Counters that are intended to maintain positive counts (treating a count <= 0 as if the key does not exist), it seems like you could either perform your operations using the + and - (or += and -=) binary operators (which will remove keys when the values drop to 0 or below) or if you have to use subtract or manual count tweaking, normalize the Counters at comparison time, that is, use +counter1 == +counter2 (unary + support added in 3.3). I agree it's sort of weird, but I feel like fixing it will just break a ton of existing code. ---------- nosy: +josh.rosenberg _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22533> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com