R. David Murray added the comment: I committed a version of this that uses Raymond's suggestion and also makes sure that the first thread is named Thread-1 as it has been in the past (there was a test failure without that fix, but I also think it makes sense for it to be Thread-1 since one would normally think of the main thread as thread 0).
I did not try to turn the test script into a test case because it would take a long time to run if it is to have a reasonable chance of displaying the bug, and it would never be a consistent failure. Thanks, Peter; sorry it took so long to get this committed. ---------- nosy: +r.david.murray resolution: accepted -> fixed stage: commit review -> resolved status: open -> closed versions: +Python 3.4, Python 3.5 -Python 2.6, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue11866> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
