Terry J. Reedy added the comment: The leak had been fixed in #9450.
"There are still the remaining issues of: - better testing for the readline module, and - attempting to work around libedit bugs. Perhaps those should become separate issues, though?" If those are current issues and anyone cares enough, yes, separate issues. ---------- nosy: +terry.reedy resolution: -> duplicate stage: -> resolved status: open -> closed superseder: -> readline.replace_history_item leaks memory. _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue8065> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
