Guido van Rossum added the comment: Maybe
transport.get_extra_info('socket').getpeercert(True) would be okay, no patch needed? On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <rep...@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou added the comment: > > > some methods take parameters (like the offender getpeercert(bool), or > > get_channel_binding() that takes an element of > > ssl.CHANNEL_BINDING_TYPES, list that may grow in the future) that need > > to be covered in the properties > > That's a good point. I don't have any strong feelings either way. Perhaps > other people want to chime in? > > As for the patch, it will need to add a unit test as well. > > ---------- > stage: -> patch review > versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue22768> > _______________________________________ > ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22768> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com