Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Maybe
transport.get_extra_info('socket').getpeercert(True)
would be okay, no patch needed?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> > some methods take parameters (like the offender getpeercert(bool), or
> > get_channel_binding() that takes an element of
> > ssl.CHANNEL_BINDING_TYPES, list that may grow in the future) that need
> > to be covered in the properties
>
> That's a good point. I don't have any strong feelings either way. Perhaps
> other people want to chime in?
>
> As for the patch, it will need to add a unit test as well.
>
> ----------
> stage: -> patch review
> versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <[email protected]>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22768>
> _______________________________________
>
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22768>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
