Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
Serhiy, about your 'huge patch' to modernize code:
I am more positive than some because:
1) To me, a one-time gentile change is not 'churning'.
2) As we link to many, most, or even all python-coded stdlib modules (I think
there is a proposal for 'all'), there is more benefit to using modern idioms.
On the other hand, 'huge' patches can be too much to discuss, justify, and
review all at once.
Using {.. } for sets consistently is a nice-sized chunk to consider. We can
identify, discuss, and decide on each sub-case (I have identified 4 so far).
It has the additional benefit of being a performance enhancement.
---
'set((...' is used in distutils (which I will not change) and in many tests.
So that is not an issue. 'frozenset((' is used 5 times in regular module code.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue22823>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
