STINNER Victor added the comment: I refactored some parts of CJK codecs for performances, after the PEP 393 was implemented. A blocker point was that these codecs have very few tests. Not for valid data but for invalid data. It may be a little bit better. I tried to write a test for each path in if/else, to test all cases, in the codecs that I modified.
By error prone, it mean that it's easy to introduce a bug or a regressio, since the code is complex and almost nobody maintains it. I'm not stongly opposed to any change. I'm just trying to understand the context. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23050> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
