Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
Here is faster implementation.
$ ./python -m timeit -s "import sqlite3; con = sqlite3.connect(':memory:');
con.row_factory = sqlite3.NamedTupleRow; con.execute('create table t (a, b)')"
-s "for i in range(100): con.execute('insert into t values (1, 2)')" --
"con.execute('select * from t').fetchall()"
100 loops, best of 3: 2.74 msec per loop
But it is still 3 times slower than sqlite3.Row.
----------
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file37673/sqlite_namedtuplerow.patch
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13299>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
