Gregory P. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: This patch looks good.
One question: in Objects/abstract.c in PyBuffer_FillInfo, why is it even testing for the PyBUF_LOCK flag at all? PEP 3118 says its valid for both reading and writing (if the underlying object supports locked access). BTW, I is someone is going to merge any py3k buffer api related changes back into the backport that is in 2.6? __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2538> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
