Martin Panter added the comment: There were a couple mistakes I found; see Reitveld. I was going to say to leave the open(mode="r") parameter as it is, since an explicit "r" is more readable, but since you already took some out, I’m not going to complain.
While many of the changes look worthwhile, I do worry that some of them will never be tested (at least until say Python 3.14 or something). E.g. I just tried running Tools/scripts/dutree.py cos it looked interesting, but was confronted with the “unorderable types: int() < NoneType()” Python 2-ism. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22831> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
