Jeff McNeil added the comment: Actually, never mind that suggestion. Now that I think a bit more about it, that actually doesn't do anything since I'd still need to set the updated timeout on the current socket object anyway. Whoops.
I'll leave it up to you as to whether we go with an approach like this as is or not. I'm happy to change the approach if there's a better one. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23863> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
