Ilia Kurenkov added the comment:

As my contribution during the sprints at PyCon 2015, I've tweaked Jervis's 
patch a little and updated the tests/docs to work with Python 3.5.

My only real change was placing the basic reader object inside a generator 
expression that filters out empty lines. Being partial to functional 
programming I find this removes some of the code clutter in __next__(), letting 
that method focus on turning rows into tuples.

Hopefully this will rekindle the discussion!

----------
nosy: +copper-head
versions: +Python 3.5
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39139/1818_py35.diff

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1818>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to