R. David Murray added the comment:

No, actually, using codecs would be the most straightforward way to achieve 
portability.  The usual way to get hex in python2 was encode('hex'), which uses 
the codec.  But if you want to use hexlify instead, I don't see any reason not 
to.  There's no reason to change the binascii module description, though, since 
it is talking about normal code, not 2/3 shared source code (where you do 
sometimes have to jump through somewhat awkward hoops).

(The One Obvious Way starting with 3.5 will be b'abcde'.hex(), but of course 
that isn't python2 compatible.)

----------
nosy: +r.david.murray
resolution:  -> not a bug
stage:  -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24144>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to