Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Benjamin Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: > > Why don't you add a Py3k warning and keep it in Py3k?
Just asked python-dev if they are okay with that. 2.6 could get a PendingDeprecationWarning and 3.0 could get a DeprecationWarning. But I don't want to do an API change between the two that breaks code like that. __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2705> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com