Stefan Behnel added the comment:
> 1) The intended solution is to require that int subclasses override tp_free.
In the way I showed? By calling either PyObject_GC_Del() or PyObject_Del()
directly? I'll happily do that (Py2.7 and Py2 "int" being dead ends makes
that pretty future proof), but it's neither obvious nor very clean.
> 2) I don't see any constructors that don't call PyInt_FromLong() -- what am I
> missing?
Not sure what you mean. int_new() immediately calls int_subtype_new(),
which then calls type->tp_alloc(). No call to PyInt_FromLong() involved.
"""
static PyObject *
int_new(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
{
PyObject *x = NULL;
int base = -909;
static char *kwlist[] = {"x", "base", 0};
if (type != &PyInt_Type)
return int_subtype_new(type, args, kwds); /* Wimp out */
...
static PyObject *
int_subtype_new(PyTypeObject *type, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds)
{
...
tmp = int_new(&PyInt_Type, args, kwds);
if (tmp == NULL)
return NULL;
if (!PyInt_Check(tmp)) {
ival = PyLong_AsLong(tmp);
if (ival == -1 && PyErr_Occurred()) {
Py_DECREF(tmp);
return NULL;
}
} else {
ival = ((PyIntObject *)tmp)->ob_ival;
}
newobj = type->tp_alloc(type, 0);
if (newobj == NULL) {
Py_DECREF(tmp);
return NULL;
}
((PyIntObject *)newobj)->ob_ival = ival;
Py_DECREF(tmp);
return newobj;
}
"""
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24469>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
