Tim Peters added the comment: Thanks for the legwork, Steven!
So far it looks like a gcc bug when using -m32 (whether ints, longs and/or pointers are 4 or 8 bytes _should_ make no difference to anything in Jason Swails's C example). But it may be a red herring anyway: there's only one chance in 2**53 of getting a random.random() result equal to 1.-2.**-53 to begin with. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24546> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
