Yury Selivanov added the comment: > I think we should add "inspect.isawaitable()", and have it pass for > *anything* that can be used in an await expression (whether that's by > implementing the Awaitable protocol, or due to special casing at the > interpreter level).
I agree. I've committed the change. Larry, please make sure that the latest patch lands in 3.5beta3. It's really important. ---------- nosy: +larry resolution: -> fixed status: open -> closed _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24400> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
