Vedran Čačić added the comment:
Benjamin, you're my hero. :-)
I'm not really at home in C source... is it possible that you have also changed
{0:1, 0:2}
to be {0:2} (as opposed to {0:1} as it is now)? I'm completely fine with that
and find it more logical (and as I said in the previous message, it matches
BDFL's mental model, which is the real reference implementation of Python:),
but I'm afraid backward compatibility zealots will ruin the fun.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24569>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
