New submission from Robert Collins: We had a discussion on the list sparked by the assret checking, and in it I proposed that the API would be cleaner if the asserts were module functions.
e.g. rather than:: a_mock.assert_called_with(Foo) assert_called_with(a_mock, Foo) Michael has objected to this saying that the current structure is part of mock's success - but I'm filing this since a number of other core devs seemed to really like the idea. We can discuss here and if the consensus is that it wouldn't be an improvement - thats fine. OTOH if the consensus is that it is an improvement, this can serve as a memo to someone to implement the new API. ---------- components: Library (Lib) messages: 246846 nosy: rbcollins priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Mock.assert* API is in user namespace type: enhancement versions: Python 3.6 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24651> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
