Martin Panter added the comment: The original Python-ideas thread: <https://www.marc.info/?t=143558954500004>
If you want shorter field names, how about just r and w (as they are currently documented)? os.write(our_pipe.w, b"data") os.read(our_pipe.r, 1024) “Input” and “output” would also work for me (though I am also happy with read, read_fd, etc). However it does seem a bit novel; in my experience people tend to say pipes have read and write ends, not inputs and outputs. os.write(our_pipe.input, b"data") os.read(our_pipe.output, 1024) ---------- nosy: +vadmium type: -> enhancement _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24536> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
