andrew cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment:

Got more important things than this to worry about, but yes, original
response not very helpful.  In a perfect world this might be either
justified more clearly or addressed.  OTOH, I get the impression hardly
anyone uses this package (docs were pretty opaque...)

Also, isn't this a "won't fix" rather than an "invalid"?

__________________________________
Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2697>
__________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to