andrew cooke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: Got more important things than this to worry about, but yes, original response not very helpful. In a perfect world this might be either justified more clearly or addressed. OTOH, I get the impression hardly anyone uses this package (docs were pretty opaque...)
Also, isn't this a "won't fix" rather than an "invalid"? __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2697> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com