Yury Selivanov added the comment: > In short, I implemented support for concurrent.futures in the asyncio Task > class instead of making concurrent.futures aware of asyncio. The __await__ > implementation in concurrent.futures closely mirrors that of asyncio's Future.
I like your approach and the proposed patch. I think we should commit this in 3.6 (the final patch should include docs & tests). ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24383> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
