Yury Selivanov added the comment: > Honestly, I've lost track of the queue design. Maybe the push-back on > cancellation is just wrong? After all, if a coroutine has received an item, > it's out of the queue, even if it gets cancelled before it can do anything > with the item.
I think the push-back is a right thing. At least, I wouldn't expect ``wait_for(queue.get(), 0.1)`` code to lose queue items *sometimes* in big codebases. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue23812> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
