Christoph Gohlke added the comment: The matplotlib extensions compiled with Python 3.5.0rc1 (/MT) are larger than those compiled with 3.5.0b4 (/MD). The C++ runtime is statically linked. This seems undesirable for the same reasons the UCRT is not linked statically.
In "Introducing the Universal CRT" [1] James McNellis "strongly recommend against static linking of the Visual C++ libraries, for both performance and serviceability reasons". In "Visual Studio 2015 RTM Now Available" [2] the same author commented that one "may deploy the Universal CRT app-locally". Do these comments not apply to CPython? [1] <http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2015/03/03/introducing-the-universal-crt.aspx> [2] <http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2015/07/20/visual-studio-2015-rtm-now-available.aspx> ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24872> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
