Timothy Geiser added the comment: I believe the special case has already been made: iterating over bytes-like objects returns ints. Natually, join() should take the same thing. Also, constructor bytearray(iterable_of_ints), the mutable-sequence expression ba[i:j:k] = t, and the function ba.extend(t) with t as an iterable of ints. It's the s.join(t) that's different than all these others.
Again: >>> ba = bytearray(b'barbaz') >>> ba[0:4:2] = b'ft' >>> ba bytearray(b'fatbaz') >>> ba.extend(b'foo') >>> ba bytearray(b'fatbazfoo') >>> ba.join(b'not_this_though') Traceback (most recent call last): File "<pyshell#32>", line 1, in <module> ba.join(b'not_this_though') TypeError: sequence item 0: expected a bytes-like object, int found I'll go ahead argue that it's exactly backwards as is. ---------- _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24892> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com