Scott Dial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> added the comment: As it stands, enumerate() already takes a "sequence" keyword as an alternative to the first positional argument (although this seems to be completely undocumented). So, as you say, METH_O is a no go.
I agree with you in that my original complaint with the positional argument was that enumerate(iterable, start) was "backwards." My other argument was that a large number of these iterator utility functions are foo(*iterable) and upon seeing enumerate(foo, bar), a reader might be inclined to assume it was equivalent to enumerate(chain(foo, bar)). __________________________________ Tracker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2831> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
