Hrvoje Abraham added the comment: I believe this is the issue. ast.literal_eval sets support can not be considered complete until it also handles empty sets. I do not consider it valid for me to explicitly handle this case in my projects using some weird hacks.
Python community settled on not introducing empty set literal because one can simply use set(), as discussed a few times before. But no corresponding alternative was defined for ast.literal_eval, maybe it should handle 'set()' as such. I strongly advise reopening this issue and finding functional solution for empty set case. I need it! ---------- nosy: +ahrvoje type: -> enhancement versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24663> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
