Martin Panter added the comment:
The patch looks technically good, though I’m not a big fan of the double
underscores, like element_get__text(). Maybe element_text_getter() instead,
because it has to match the “getter” signature?
Personally, I would say keep the doc strings basic. If you want to add more
depth about “tail”, I suggest to keep it to the main RST documentation (which
was updated fairly recently). But it would be good to quickly distinguish text
and tail other than by name. Maybe:
{"text", ..., "A string of text directly after the start tag, or None"},
{"tail", ..., "A string of text directly after the end tag, or None"},
----------
nosy: +martin.panter
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue7990>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
