STINNER Victor added the comment: Thanks for your bug report.
I fixed the issue differently, by adding a base class to benchmark result classes. I also implemented the format output format for pybench. By the way, perf.py badly handles errors :-/ CSV output and table output fail to handle errors. pybench output with my change: ******************* $ ./perf.py -f -r -b pybench python2.7 python2.7 (...) ### pybench ### Min: 285 -> 284: 1.00x faster Avg: 289 -> 292: 1.01x slower $ ./perf.py -f --csv=pybench.csv -r -b pybench python2.7 python2.7 (...) ### pybench ### Min: 283 -> 286: 1.01x slower Avg: 287 -> 290: 1.01x slower $ cat pybench.csv Benchmark,Base,Changed pybench,283.000000,286.000000 $ ./perf.py -f -O table -r -b pybench python2.7 python2.7 (...) +-----------+-----------+-----------+--------------+ | Benchmark | python2.7 | python2.7 | Change | +===========+===========+===========+==============+ | pybench | 288.0 | 289.0 | 1.00x slower | +-----------+-----------+-----------+--------------+ ******************* ---------- nosy: +haypo _______________________________________ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <http://bugs.python.org/issue25721> _______________________________________ _______________________________________________ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
