Martin Panter added the comment:
Mark: This issue is about StringIO only. I am not proposing any change to
TextIOBase or how on-disk text files are handled.
I intend to propose a patch to make StringIO more liberal, but haven’t got
around to it yet. Do you think it would be worthwhile? IMO it would make
StringIO a fairly efficient mutable text buffer. The alternatives [list(str),
array("u")] are slower and/or use more than 4 bytes per character.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <[email protected]>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue25190>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
